Frederik Van De Putte Adaptive Logic Characterizations of Input / Output Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
We translate unconstrained and constrained input/output logics as introduced by Makinson and van der Torre to modal logics, using adaptive logics for the constrained case. The resulting reformulation has some additional benefits. First, we obtain a prooftheoretic (dynamic) characterization of input/output logics. Second, we demonstrate that our framework naturally gives rise to useful variants and allows to express important notions that go beyond the expressive means of input/output logics, such as violations
منابع مشابه
Three formats of prioritized adaptive logics: a comparative study
A broad range of defeasible reasoning forms has been explicated by prioritized adaptive logics. However, the relative lack in meta-theory of many of these logics stands in sharp contrast to the frequency of their application. This paper presents the first comparative study of a large group of prioritized adaptive logics. Three formats of such logics are discussed: superpositions of adaptive log...
متن کاملHierarchic adaptive logics
This paper discusses the proof theory, semantics and meta-theory of a class of adaptive logics, called hierarchic adaptive logics. Their specific characteristics are illustrated throughout the paper with the use of one exemplary logic HK, an explicans for reasoning with prioritized belief bases. A generic proof theory for these systems is defined, together with a less complex proof theory for a...
متن کاملAvoiding Deontic Explosion by Contextually Restricting Aggregation
In this paper, we present an adaptive logic for deontic conflicts, called P2.1, that is based on Goble’s logic SDLaPe—a bimodal extension of Goble’s logic P that invalidates aggregation for all prima facie obligations. The logic P2.1 has several advantages with respect to SDLaPe. For consistent sets of obligations it yields the same results as Standard Deontic Logic and for inconsistent sets of...
متن کاملAdaptive logics: a parametric approach
Adaptive logics (ALs) in standard format are defined in terms of a monotonic core logic L, a distinct set of ‘abnormal’ formulas and a strategy, which can be either reliability or minimal abnormality. In this article we we ask under which conditions the consequence relation of two ALs that use the same strategy are identical, and when one is a proper subrelation of the other. This results in a ...
متن کاملA Logic for prioritized normative reasoning
In this paper we present the logic MP⊏ that explicates reasoning on the basis of prioritized obligations. Although formal criteria to handle prioritized obligations have been formulated in the literature, little attention has been paid to the actual (non-monotonic) reasoning that makes use of these criteria. The dynamic proof theory of MP⊏ fills this lacuna. This paper focuses on premise sets c...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016